|
Book Review The difficulties in explaining abstract principles and spiritual experiences have confounded seekers through the ages. Westerners have spent centuries perfecting an objective vocabulary capable of minutely describing visible substance and form, but use terms like soul, spiritual, and psychic with such a lack of precision as to confuse everyone. It is imperative that we strive to understand one another, and to do so we need a better grasp of what others mean by the terms they use, as well as to discover and define our own words with care. For more than sixty years theosophical students have relied on G. de Purucker's Occult Glossary to clarify and illumine philosophical terms used in source theosophical literature. Defining and interpreting some 300 metaphysical terms, this book is also one of the best introductions to specific theosophic ideas and their inner implications. An expanded index makes philosophical relationships and associations more readily apparent.
As Purucker's definitions illustrate, there is a whole philosophy in the etymological roots of words. Take prakriti for example, which may be defined as "nature" or the material that makes up the natural world. Purucker explains that the word is a compound consisting of the prepositional prefix pra meaning "forwards"
or "progression," and kriti, a noun-form from the verbal
root kri, "to make" or "to do." Therefore prakriti
means literally "production" or "bringing forth,"
"originating," and by an extension of meaning it also signifies
the primordial or original state or condition or form of anything: primary,
original substance. -- p. 132 As searchers after truth, we often wish to study ancient and modern religion, science, and philosophy. Few of us have the educational back- ground to plunge very deeply into these subjects without a great deal of help; but here again we gain tremendous advantage by using the Occult Glossary as it offers comparisons of the Buddhist, Gnostic, Hebrew, Hindu, and Greek interpretations -- sometimes of a single subject. The book itself was not written directly by Purucker, but was compiled by one of his students, Geoffrey Barborka, from transcripts of lectures given in the early thirties at Point Loma, California. A longtime scholar of Occidental and Oriental languages and philosophies, Hobart Lorenz Gottfried de Purucker, M.A., D.Litt., occupied the chair of Hebrew and Sanskrit at Theosophical University and later became its President before becoming the head of the Theosophical Society from 1929 till his passing in 1942. His love affair with language and philosophy began early in life. I was destined for the church by my father, who was a clergyman of the
Anglican communion, and pastor of the American church in Geneva. My father
taught me Greek; he taught me Hebrew; he had teachers for me in other
languages. Living in a French-speaking country, of course I spoke French;
my mother being an American, of course I spoke English; my father being
a German, of course I spoke German. I was also taught Italian and Spanish.
I was likewise taught Anglo-Saxon. . . . When I was about fourteen years
old, I remember translating, as a Christmas gift for my father, the entire
Greek New Testament, and he said it was very well done. . . . When I was
seventeen I translated from the Hebrew the book of Genesis, as a birthday
gift to my father. -- San Diego Union, July 27, 1929; cf. The
Theosophical Forum, New Series (1:1), September 1929, p. 10 Purucker had a brilliance for explaining issues as clearly to the general reader as he did comprehensively to the serious student. One of his admirers, Boris de Zirkoff, described his teachings this way: The writings of Dr. de Purucker cover the entire scope and breadth of
the Esoteric Philosophy and have been declared by some as second to those
of H.P.B. herself. They are presented in a systematic form, often with
great detail, and are couched in both a scientific and philosophical terminology.
Their carefully worded explanations, their authoritative character and
the unimpeachable source which they have been drawn from, make them stand
as a unique outline of the ancient Gnosis, also known as Brahmavidya.
-- H. P. Blavatsky: Collected Writings 12:770 |